The European Court of Auditors (ECA) has recently highlighted the Spanish Administration as a concerning example of poor fund management within the European Union. In its latest report, the ECA criticized the Spanish government’s handling of EU funds, pointing out inefficiencies, lack of transparency, and inadequate oversight as significant issues. This evaluation raises alarms about the effectiveness of fund utilization in Spain, potentially affecting the country’s credibility and future access to EU resources. The report serves as a cautionary tale for other EU member states, emphasizing the need for stricter governance and more accountable financial practices in managing public funds.
The European Court of Auditors has recently criticized the Spanish administration for its ineffective management of multi-million-euro European funds. In a comprehensive report from the Luxembourg-based body, Spain was singled out for its subpar performance among the various administrations assessed.
The report notes that the countries analyzed have undertaken several initiatives to enhance their administrative capacities for implementing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). These efforts include recruiting additional staff, providing operational support, and simplifying administrative procedures. However, the report’s authors caution that “many problems” persist.
Spain, in particular, is highlighted as a concerning case. The report explains that Spain’s national recovery and resilience plan included several targeted reforms aimed at modernizing the public administration, such as strengthening the public procurement framework, improving procurement processes, and developing a robust system for managing and monitoring the implementation of the MRR.
However, the report criticizes the slow progress in implementing these reforms, noting that a critical initiative to enhance the administration’s ability to attract and retain staff was delayed, with approval in Congress only occurring in December 2023.
Additionally, the European Court of Auditors refers to a report from the Spanish Court of Auditors, which also highlighted significant challenges in adequately planning human resources and ensuring the necessary resources, particularly at the regional level, for the effective implementation of the MRR.
Read more: Inma Cuesta mother for the second time with her partner Ángeles, an actress and producer
In addition to assessing the Spanish case, the European Court of Auditors also reviewed the situation in three other countries—Italy, Romania, and Slovakia—as part of its evaluation. Italy, which, along with Spain, has been one of the largest recipients of European funds, received a more favorable assessment. The report commends the Italian government for successfully implementing several critical reforms in its public administration, including improvements to contracting procedures, the development of a comprehensive IT system for monitoring and managing the application of the MRR, and the simplification of administrative processes, among other achievements.
However, the Court also draws attention to concerns raised by Italy’s supreme audit institution in March 2023. These concerns include the “high turnover of contracted staff” and the inherent complexity of the procedures necessary to bring projects to fruition. While Italy has made significant strides in reforming its public administration, these challenges pose ongoing risks to the effective implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
Little staff and a lot of paperwork
Since the approval of the Spanish Recovery Plan by the European Commission, a persistent issue has been the inadequate staffing levels within the public administration, a concern frequently raised by companies and organizations seeking subsidies. The need for more qualified personnel to manage the overwhelming volume of applications has further exacerbated the problem. Spain has never before been allocated such a significant amount of public funds—over 70 billion euros—making these challenges particularly critical.
Another widespread concern is the complexity and sluggishness of the administrative procedures required to access European funds. These bureaucratic hurdles have led many self-employed workers and entrepreneurs to abandon their applications altogether. In a report published last spring, the Spanish Confederation of Employers’ Organizations (CEOE) identified the lack of public-private collaboration as “the main bottleneck” preventing companies from effectively learning about, accessing, and receiving funding for transformative projects under the Recovery Plan. The CEOE also highlighted the “network of challenges at the three levels of the Administration” and underscored the urgent need to “improve agility and ensure the widespread distribution of aid.”
Delay of European funds
The European Court of Auditors has reiterated the European Commission’s call for governments to efficiently use their resources and ensure they possess the necessary administrative capacity. Only through these measures can the effective implementation of reforms and investments be guaranteed as planned. However, the auditors’ latest findings indicate that Spanish administrations have yet to manage the allocated funds with the required speed and efficiency.
The report also issues a broader warning concerning “delays in the disbursement and implementation of projects” across the EU. This sluggish progress poses a significant risk that Member States may not fully absorb or utilize the funds in time, potentially failing to complete planned measures before the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) expires in August 2026.
Ivana Maletić, the ECA member responsible for the audit, emphasized the critical importance of timely fund absorption, stating, “It helps to avoid bottlenecks in the implementation of measures towards the end of the Facility’s lifespan and reduces the risk of inefficient and erroneous spending.” Maletić further highlighted that, as of the report’s publication, EU countries had utilized less than a third of the planned funds and had made less than 30% progress toward achieving their predefined milestones and targets.
The Court’s report stems from an extensive audit that drew on a variety of sources. The authors analyzed the European Commission’s assessments of national recovery plans and reviewed the payment applications of four Member States selected for the study: Spain, Italy, Slovakia, and Romania. These countries were chosen based on their progress in implementing the RRF and the volume of funds they were allocated. Additionally, the auditors conducted on-site visits to interview the authorities responsible for implementing and coordinating the grants.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did the European Court of Auditors criticize about the Spanish administration’s management of European funds?
The European Court of Auditors criticized the Spanish administration for its slow and inefficient management of multi-million-euro European funds. The report highlighted delays in implementing necessary reforms, inadequate staffing, and complex administrative procedures that could have improved the effective use of these funds.
Why is the management of European funds vital for Spain?
Managing European funds effectively is crucial for Spain as these funds are intended to support the country’s recovery and resilience efforts. With over 70 billion euros allocated, Spain needs to ensure that these resources are used efficiently to achieve planned reforms and investments, which are vital for economic recovery and long-term growth.
What specific issues did the Court of Auditors identify in Spain’s handling of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF)?
The Court of Auditors identified several issues, including the slow approval of reforms aimed at modernizing the public administration, challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified staff, and bureaucratic hurdles that complicate the process of accessing and utilizing funds. These shortcomings have led to delays in the disbursement and implementation of projects under the RRF.
How does the situation in Spain compare to other EU countries regarding the management of European funds?
While Spain faced significant challenges, the Court of Auditors’ report also reviewed the management of European funds in Italy, Romania, and Slovakia. Italy, in particular, received a more favorable assessment for its progress in public administration reforms, although it also faced challenges such as high staff turnover and procedural complexities.
What are the broader implications of the report for the EU and its Member States?
The report warns of a broader issue across the EU, where delays in disbursement and project implementation risk Member States needing to fully absorb the funds in time. If planned measures are not completed before the RRF expires in August 2026, this could lead to missed opportunities for economic recovery and development.
What actions has the European Commission urged Member States to take following the Court of Auditors’ findings?
The European Commission has urged Member States to efficiently use their resources and ensure they have the necessary administrative capacity to implement reforms and investments as planned. This includes improving staffing levels, simplifying administrative procedures, and enhancing public-private collaboration to maximize the impact of the Recovery and Resilience Facility.
Conclusion
The European Court of Auditors’ report serves as a stark warning about the critical challenges facing Spain in its management of multi-million-euro European funds. The report highlights significant areas for improvement, including delays in implementing necessary reforms, inadequate staffing, and complex administrative procedures, all of which have hindered the effective use of these vital resources. Spain’s struggles in efficiently managing the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) funds not only jeopardize its economic recovery but also underscore the broader risks faced by the EU in ensuring timely and effective fund absorption across Member States. The findings emphasize the urgent need for Spain and other EU countries to strengthen their administrative capacities, streamline procedures, and enhance public-private collaboration to fully realize the potential of these funds before the RRF’s expiration in 2026.
